-
Re: Need a pair of eyes on these numerals
I think Andreas is suggesting an entirely new shape, in which the parts that are thin and thick are different. It could be something like this very rough sketch.1 -
Re: Need a pair of eyes on these numerals
Can we see some year names using only one form of 4, rather than mixing them like this? Having the two forms present is distracting and makes it difficult to judge each individually.1 -
Re: On the appropriateness of small-cap-specific symbols
If find the height overshoot of the smallcap ! and ? distracting. I think one should aim for these to have the same vertical relationship to the smallcaps as the full size versions have to the caps, …4 -
Re: Need a pair of eyes on these numerals
That reads as a 4 now. I am not so sure about the other form, with the turned up nose.I find setting the names of past years to be a good test of numerals, e.g. 1453, 1944, 2024, because we are condi…1 -
Re: Need a pair of eyes on these numerals
I think the handling of the stem and crossbar is looking much better. The descending teardrop shape in the 4 still seems too heavy compared to similar shape at the top right of 3 and 7. It makes sens…2
